Archives of Dermatology · 2011 · 140 citations · 32 references
MedicinePlastic SurgerySurgeryHemostasisMicrosurgeryVascular SurgeryChronic Venous InsufficiencyLaser SurgeryThrombosisVaricose Vein TreatmentVenous DiseaseVenous InterventionsAssessment Of Varicose VeinsChronic Venous Insufficiency ManagementClinical Severity ScoringEndovenous Laser AblationLaser AblationSuperficial Venous InsufficiencySurgical StrippingSurgical Vein Stripping
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) with high ligation and stripping (HLS) as standard treatment for great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. DESIGN: Two-center randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Interventions were performed on ambulatory and hospitalized patients at 2 vein centers, a university dermatology department (EVLT-treated group), and a specialized vein clinic (HLS-treated group). PATIENTS: Random sample of 400 patients with GSV insufficiency. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned (1:1) to EVLT or HLS of the GSV from September 2004 through March 2007; 185 and 161 patients (limbs), respectively, were treated per protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically recurrent varicose veins after surgery (REVAS classification, primary study objective), duplex-detected saphenofemoral recurrence, clinical venous severity scoring (Homburg Varicose Vein Severity Score), hemodynamics (venous refilling time), quality of life (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire 2), adverse effects, and visual analog scale-based evaluations of patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Clinically recurrent varicose veins after surgery were similarly observed in both groups: 16.2% (EVLT-treated group) vs 23.1% (HLS-treated group); P = .15. Duplex-detected saphenofemoral refluxes occurred significantly more frequently after EVLT (17.8% vs 1.3%; P < .001). Both treatments equally improved medical condition (Homburg Varicose Vein Severity Score) and disease-related quality of life. Endovenous laser treatment caused more adverse effects (phlebitic reaction, tightness, dyspigmentation) but revealed advantages concerning hemodynamics, recovery, and cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both EVLT and HLS are comparably safe and effective procedures to treat GSV incompetence. The significantly higher rate and the course of duplex-detected saphenofemoral recurrences after EVLT remain a matter of further investigations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN18322872.
32
Thomas M. Proebstle, Hans‐Anton Lehr, A. Kargl et al. · Journal of Vascular Surgery · 2002 · 411 citations · Full text
Medicine, Surgery, Hemostasis +11