How to Attain Ultralow Interfacial Tension and Three‐Phase Behavior with Surfactant Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review. Part 1. Optimum Formulation for Simple Surfactant–Oil–Water Ternary Systems

Jean‐Louis Salager, Ana Forgiarini, Johnny Bullón

Journal of Surfactants and Detergents · 2013 · 209 citations · 106 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Ultralow interfacial tension and three‑phase behavior are essential for surfactant‑flooded oil recovery, and have been linked to equal surfactant–oil–water interactions and a linear correlation among formulation variables and temperature. The review aims to show how formulation‑scan techniques based on these correlations can identify optimal surfactant–oil–water formulations and characterize unknown surfactants and oils. The authors use formulation‑scan techniques that apply the linear correlation to identify optimal surfactant–oil–water mixtures and to evaluate unknown surfactants and oils. The authors report the valid range of the four‑variable model and provide guidance on how to test it.

Abstract

Abstract Enhanced recovery of crude oil by surfactant flooding requires the attainment of an ultralow interfacial tension. Since Winsor's work in the 1950s it has been known that a minimum interfacial tension and a concomitant three‐phase behavior of a surfactant–oil–water system occurs when the interactions of the surfactant and the oil and water phases are exactly equal. It has been known since the 1970s that these conditions are attained when a linear correlation is satisfied between the formulation variables, which are characteristic parameters of the substances as well as the temperature. This first part of our review on how to attain ultralow interfacial tension for enhanced oil recovery shows how formulation scan techniques using these correlations are used to determine an optimum formulation and to characterize unknown surfactants and oils. The physicochemical significance of the original empirical correlation is reported as the surfactant affinity difference or hydrophilic–lipophilic deviation model. We report the range of accurate validity of, and how to test, this simple model with four variables.

References

106