PLoS ONE · 2015 · 79 citations · 40 references
MedicineOncologyPreventive MedicineCancer ScreeningEarly DetectionProteomicsBiomarker ValidationCancer BiomarkersClinical ProteomicsColorectal CancerEarly Cancer DetectionMolecular BiomarkersBiomarker PanelsBiomarkersBlood-based BiomarkersColorectal Cancer BiomarkersColorectal Cancer ScreeningDiagnostic BiomarkersProtein Biomarker PanelsProtein Biomarkers
BACKGROUND: The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are preventable by early detection and removal of precancerous polyps. Even though CRC is the second most common internal cancer in Australia, only 30 per cent of the population considered to have risk factors participate in stool-based test screening programs. Evidence indicates a robust, blood-based, diagnostic assay would increase screening compliance. A number of potential diagnostic blood-based protein biomarkers for CRC have been reported, but all lack sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic. The aim of this study was to identify and validate a panel of protein-based biomarkers in independent cohorts that could be translated to a reliable, non-invasive blood-based screening test. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In two independent cohorts (n = 145 and n = 197), we evaluated seven single biomarkers in serum of CRC patients and age/gender matched controls that showed a significant difference between controls and CRC, but individually lack the sensitivity for diagnostic application. Using logistic regression strategies, we identified a panel of three biomarkers that discriminated between controls and CRC with 73% sensitivity at 95% specificity, when applied to either of the two cohorts. This panel comprised of Insulin like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), Dickkopf-3 (DKK3), and Pyruvate kinase M2(PKM2). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneous nature of CRC, a single biomarker is unlikely to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity for use as a stand-alone diagnostic screening test and a panel of markers may be more effective. We have identified a 3 biomarker panel that has higher sensitivity and specificity for early stage (Stage I and -II) disease than the faecal occult blood test, raising the possibility for its use as a non-invasive blood diagnostic or screening test.
40
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008
Jacques Ferlay, Hai‐Rim Shin, Freddie Bray et al. · International Journal of Cancer · 2010 · 21.4K citations
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Xavier Robin, Natacha Turck, Alexandre Hainard et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2011 · 14K citations · Full text
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening
Thomas F. Imperiale, David F. Ransohoff, Steven H. Itzkowitz et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 1.9K citations
Circulating Methylated SEPT9 DNA in Plasma Is a Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer
Theo deVos, Reimo Tetzner, Fabian Model et al. · Clinical Chemistry · 2009 · 528 citations · Full text