Development and Change · 2009 · 62 citations · 13 references
Social SciencesDevelopment StudiesPolitical ScienceInstitutional TheoryPolitical EconomySocial DevelopmentComparative GovernanceDevelopment GovernancePolitical Economy Of GovernancePolitical InstitutionalizationWorld Bank Development PolicyWorld Bank Group
ABSTRACT This article seeks to reconceptualize the post‐Washington consensus (PWC) by focusing not simply upon the institutional structures and ideology promoted by it, but the manner in which these are promoted on the ground. The aim is to reveal a central distinction between the Washington consensus and the PWC that has been somewhat neglected: their diverging approaches to implementation. The author focuses on the World Bank‐funded Kecamatan Development Program (KDP) in Indonesia, a project that is viewed by some as being somewhat unorthodox. He argues that in addition to its promotion of the latest round of institutional reforms, what is really different about KDP, compared with older approaches to market‐led development typical of the Washington consensus, is the manner in which it delivers its mix of neoliberalism. What is radical about a programme like KDP is that it constitutes a new Trojan horse for embedding market‐centred norms and practices. 1 In general, this is demonstrative of a key difference between the Washington consensus and the PWC that has been undervalued in many analyses of the dominant development paradigm: the methods used to embed and sustain liberal markets.
13
Latin American adjustment: how much has happened?
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 1.6K citations
Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics
Joseph E. Stiglitz · American Economic Review · 2002 · 1.4K citations
Measuring Social Welfare With and Without Poverty Lines
Martin Ravallion · American Economic Review · 1994 · 1.1K citations