Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2006 · 210 citations · 20 references
MedicineMaternal HealthObstetricsMaternal Health DisparitiesMaternal-fetal MedicineMedical GeneticsPregnancyPrenatal AssessmentPrenatal CarePrenatal Genetic DiagnosisPrenatal Molecular TestingPrenatal Risk AssessmentDiagnostic Testing UtilizationMaternal Demographic DeterminantsPrenatal Care Access DisparitiesPrenatal Diagnostic TestingPrenatal Genetic ScreeningPrenatal Screening Decision-makingPrenatal Testing DecisionsProspective Cohort Data
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of prenatal genetic testing decisions and explore whether racial or ethnic and socioeconomic differences are explained by knowledge, attitudes, and preferences. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 827 English-, Spanish-, or Chinese-speaking pregnant women presenting for care by 20 weeks of gestation at 1 of 23 San Francisco Bay-area obstetrics clinics and practices. Our primary outcome measure for women aged less than 35 years was any prenatal genetic testing use compared with none, and for women aged 35 years or older, prenatal testing strategy (no testing, screening test first, straight to invasive diagnostic testing). Baseline questionnaires were completed before any prenatal test use; test use was assessed after 30 gestational weeks. RESULTS: Among women aged less than 35 years, no racial or ethnic differences in test use emerged. Multivariable analyses yielded three testing predictors: prenatal care site (P = .024), inclination to terminate pregnancy of a Down-syndrome-affected fetus (odds ratio 2.94, P = .002) and belief that modern medicine interferes too much in pregnancy (odds ratio .85, P = .036). Among women aged 35 years or older, observed racial or ethnic and socioeconomic differences in testing strategy were mediated by faith and fatalism, value of testing information, and perceived miscarriage risk. Multivariable predictors of testing strategy included these 3 mediators (P = .035, P < .001, P = .037, respectively) and health care system distrust (P = .045). A total of 29.5% of screen-positive women declined amniocentesis; 6.6% of women screening negative underwent amniocentesis. CONCLUSION: Racial or ethnic and socioeconomic differences in prenatal testing strategy are mediated by risk perception and attitudes. Screening is not the best choice for many women. Optimal prenatal testing counseling requires clarification of risks and consideration of key attitudes and preferences regarding the possible sequence of events after testing decisions.
20
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
Annette M. O’Connor · Medical Decision Making · 1995 · 2.5K citations
First-Trimester or Second-Trimester Screening, or Both, for Down's Syndrome
Fergal D. Malone, Jacob A. Canick, Robert H. Ball et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +17
First-Trimester Screening for Trisomies 21 and 18
Ronald J. Wapner, Elizabeth Thom, Joe Leigh Simpson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2003 · 567 citations · Full text
Medicine, Genetics, Obstetrics +17
Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets
Xiao‐Li Meng, Donald B. Rubin · Biometrika · 1992 · 352 citations
Nicholas Wald, Charles H. Rodeck, Allan Hackshaw et al. · Journal of Medical Screening · 2003 · 332 citations