The Journal of Creative Behavior · 2014 · 40 citations · 36 references
ManagementHuman DevelopmentPsychologyCreativityIndividual DifferencesPsychometricsCreative CognitionCreativity AssessmentIndividual CreativityAdolescent CreativityAge-related Creativity DifferencesConstruct Validity AssessmentCreative Thinking DevelopmentCreativity TestsIndividual Differences In CreativityPsychometric PropertiesVerbal Creativity
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare, through a Confirmatory Factor Analysis, two different theoretical models that explain the operationalized creativity construct with the Verbal Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking ( TTCT ), Form B. Model 1 is represented by six factors which correspond to each activity and its respective indicators while Model 2 is integrated by three factors which correspond to each TTCT ability (i.e., Fluency, Originality, and Flexibility) and the corresponding indicators for each variable. The study was carried out with a sample consisting of 432 Spanish‐speaking youngsters of both sexes aged 15–26. According to the research findings, the model which showed the most satisfactory fit identifies six correlated factors that correspond to each of the activities proposed ( χ 2 = 414.48; df = 116; χ 2 / df = 3.57; GFI = .90; NFI = .95; CFI = .96 and RMSEA = .077). These results are discussed according to its psychometric implications for the construct assessment in different fields.
36