Publication | Closed Access
Carbon dioxide efflux from the floor of a boreal aspen forest. II. Evaluation of methods — verification by infra-red analysis of a dynamic closed chamber
20
Citations
18
References
1998
Year
Soil GasCarbon SequestrationBiogeochemistryEngineeringBoreal Aspen ForestSoil Carbon CycleDynamic Closed ChamberForestrySoil FcCarbon SinkSoil Co 2Global ExchangeForest CarbonForest SoilCarbon Dioxide EffluxEarth ScienceForest Biomass
Global carbon exchange concerns demand reliable soil CO₂ efflux estimates. The study aims to identify suitable methods for estimating soil CO₂ efflux. Using a dynamic closed chamber with an infrared gas analyzer, the authors compared three alternative approaches—diffusion theory, an empirical relationship, a steady‑state chamber, and temperature‑based daytime estimates—to assess soil CO₂ flux. The DCC‑IRGA results aligned reasonably with diffusion theory and excellently with the empirical, steady‑state, and temperature‑based methods, indicating all approaches are viable. Keywords: CO₂ flux, soil respiration, soil CO₂ concentration, eddy correlation.
Concern over the global exchange of carbon has highlighted the need for reliable estimates of soil CO 2 efflux (soil Fc). Appropriate methods to estimate soil Fc must be identified and adopted. In this study we used a dynamic closed chamber and infra-red gas analyzer (DCC-IRGA) to verify the use of three other methods in a boreal aspen (Populus tremuloides) forest. The three methods were: (1) soil CO 2 concentration gradients and volumetric soil moisture by both diffusion theory (a) and empirical relationship (b), (2) an automated steady-state chamber and (3) daytime estimates derived from a relationship between soil temperature and nighttime eddy correlation measures of CO 2 fluxes above the forest understory (4 m) and overstorey (39 m). We found reasonable agreement between DCC-IRGA and method 1a (R 2 = 0.44 to 0.62), and excellent agreement between DCC-IRGA and the other methods (1b, R 2 = 0.76 to 0.88; 2, R 2 = 0.89 and 3, R 2 = 0.64 to 0.80). Each of these methods has advantages beyond the scope of the DCC-IRGA, and these are discussed. Key words: CO 2 flux, soil respiration, soil CO 2 concentration, eddy correlation
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1