Enhanced self‐determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community‐based work or living environments

Michael L. Wehmeyer, Nancy Bolding

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · 2001 · 301 citations · 23 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Self‑determination in adults with intellectual disability has gained international attention, prompting efforts to enhance related skills and shift funding toward consumer control, while recognizing that the environment—especially restrictive living or work settings—can limit opportunities for choice and is linked to better quality of life. The study aimed to assess changes in self‑determination, autonomy, and life choices among adults with intellectual disability before and after moving from restrictive to community‑based work or living environments. Self‑determination was measured over an average of six months before and after the move, comparing outcomes in restrictive versus community‑based settings. Paired‑sample t‑tests revealed significant, more adaptive improvements in self‑determination, autonomous functioning, and life choices following the move, supporting the view that community‑based environments enhance self‑determination while restrictive settings constrain it.

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the self‐determination construct has received increased international visibility and utilization in the field of intellectual disability (ID). This has resulted in efforts to promote skills enhancing self‐determination, and in efforts to change how adult services are funded to allocate resources to increase consumer control and direction. An important component to consider in both of these efforts is the role of the environment on self‐determination. The present study examined the self‐determination, autonomy and life choices of individuals with ID before and after they moved from a more restrictive work or living environment. The self‐determination of adults with ID was measured for an average 6‐months before and after a move from a more restrictive living or working environment to a community‐based setting. Paired‐sample t ‐tests indicated that there were significant changes, in each case in a more adaptive direction, in self‐determination, autonomous functioning and life choices following a move to a less restrictive environment. The present findings contribute to emerging evidence that the self‐determination of individuals with ID is limited by congregate living or work settings which limit opportunities for choice and decision‐making. Alternatively, more normalized, community‐based environments support and enhance self‐determination. Because self‐determination has been linked to positive adult outcomes and enhanced quality of life, it is important to consider ways to enable people with ID to live and work in their communities.

References

23