Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2014 · 24 citations · 22 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryChemotherapyGastrointestinal OncologySurgical OncologyAbdominal Oncology ImagingAdjuvant ChemotherapyAdjuvant TherapyColorectal CancerColorectal SurgeryMalignant NeoplasmsAdjuvant Clinical TrialsAdjuvant Concurrent ChemoradiationAnatomic High-risk FeaturesColon Cancer SurgeryColorectal Cancer Adjuvant TherapyPrognostic Factors AnalysisRectal Cancer ImagingRectal Cancer Surgery
INTRODUCTION: There remains a lack of high quality randomised trial evidence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II rectal cancer, particularly in the presence of high risk features such as extramural venous invasion (EMVI). The aim of this study was to explore this issue through a survey of colorectal surgeons and gastrointestinal oncologists. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to a group of colorectal surgeons who were members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. The survey was also sent to a group of gastrointestinal oncologists through the Pelican Cancer Foundation. Reminder emails were sent at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 142 surgeons (54% response rate) and 99 oncologists (68% response rate) responded to the survey. The majority in both groups of clinicians thought EMVI was an important consideration in adjuvant treatment decision making and commented routinely on this in their multidisciplinary team meeting. Although both would consider treating patients on the basis of EMVI detected by magnetic resonance imaging, oncologists were more selective. Both surgeons and oncologists were prepared to offer patients with EMVI adjuvant chemotherapy but there was lack of consensus on the benefit. CONCLUSIONS: This survey reinforces the evolution in thinking with regard to adjuvant therapy in stage II disease. Factors such as EMVI should be given due consideration and the prognostic information we offer patients must be more accurate. Historical data may not accurately reflect today's practice and it may be time to consider an appropriately designed trial to address this contentious issue.
22
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Rolf Sauer, Heinz Becker, Werner Hohenberger et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2004 · 6.1K citations
W. van Gijn, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Irıs D. Nagtegaal et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2011 · 1.9K citations
Michael J. O’Connell, James A. Martenson, Harry S. Wieand et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 · 1.1K citations · Full text