WOMEN AND THE FALSE PROMISE OF MICROENTERPRISE

Tracy Bachrach Ehlers, Karen Main

Gender & Society · 1998 · 157 citations · 10 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Since the 1980s, microenterprise development programs have proliferated in the United States, promoted as tools for economic development and poverty alleviation, especially for low‑income women and welfare mothers. This article contends that microenterprise development is more detrimental and problematic than it is portrayed. The authors identify two mechanisms: gender constraints steer women toward small, undercapitalized, barely profitable “pink‑collar” home‑based businesses, and training programs reinforce this segregation by emphasizing individual growth over sociocultural realities. Consequently, women remain economically vulnerable and socially peripheral rather than integrating into the mainstream business world.

Abstract

Since the 1980s, microenterprise development programs have proliferated in the United States, where they are widely praised as strategies for economic development and poverty alleviation, especially for low-income women and welfare mothers. Based on research in a highly respected urban center for women, this article argues that microenterprise development is more detrimental and problematic than it is purported to be. Two reasons are isolated. First, gender constraints mean women tend to choose small-scale, undercapitalized, and barely profitable “pink-collar” businesses, largely home-based operations based on work women are already doing as part of their gender-specific role. Second, microenterprise training programs reinforce this business segregation by discounting the sociocultural conditions women bring with them to business and instead emphasizing the personal growth of individuals. The result is that women are encouraged to maintain their economic vulnerability and social peripheralization rather than become part of the mainstream business world.

References

10