Structural and Aerodynamic Models in Nonlinear Flight Dynamics of Very Flexible Aircraft

Rafael Palacios, Joseba Murua, Robert G. Cook

AIAA Journal · 2010 · 179 citations · 28 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study evaluates computational models for flight dynamics simulations of low‑speed aircraft with very‑flexible high‑aspect‑ratio wings. The authors compare displacement‑based, strain‑based, and intrinsic geometrically‑nonlinear composite beam models with thin‑strip and vortex lattice aerodynamic methods, assessing numerical efficiency and integration simplicity for flexible aircraft flight dynamics. The unified equations recover all beam finite‑element models, enabling shear‑effect extensions; intrinsic beam solutions are several times faster, and thin‑strip models perform well for small‑amplitude dynamics, while large‑amplitude wing motions require full 3‑D vortex lattice descriptions.

Abstract

An evaluation of computational models is carried out for flight dynamics simulations on low-speed aircraft with very-flexible high-aspect ratio wings. Structural dynamic models include displacement-based, strain-based, and intrinsic (first-order) geometrically-nonlinear composite beams, while thin-strip and vortex lattice methods are considered for the unsteady aerodynamics. It is first shown that all different beam finite element models (previously derived in the literature from different assumptions) can be consistently obtained from a single set of equations. This approach has been used to expand existing strain-based models to include shear effects. Comparisons are made in terms of numerical efficiency and simplicity of integration in flexible aircraft flight dynamics studies. On the structural modeling, it was found that intrinsic solutions can be several times faster than conventional ones for aircraft-type geometries. For the aerodynamic modeling, thin-strip models based on indicial airfoil response are found to perform well in situations dominated by small amplitude dynamics around large quasi-static wing deflections, while large-amplitude wing dynamics require three-dimensional descriptions (e.g. vortex lattice).

References

28