<i>E</i>and<i>Z</i>Conformations of Esters, Thiol Esters, and Amides

Diwakar M. Pawar, Abdelnaser A. Khalil, Denise R. Hooks, Kenneth H. Collins, T. J. Elliott, J. Nicole White Stafford, Lucille L. Smith, Eric A. Noe

Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1998 · 85 citations · 37 references

Concepts

Abstract

Populations and free-energy differences for the E and Z conformations of S-methyl, cyclopropyl, isopropyl, and cyclopentyl thioformate were determined by low-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy, and free-energy barriers of 10.63 and 11.84 kcal/mol were obtained for interconversion of E and Z conformations of S-methyl thioformate at −52.4 °C. Populations and free-energy differences were also determined at room temperature by using 13C NMR for a series of N-substituted formamides and N-cyclopropylacetamide in 1% solutions in CD2Cl2/CH2Cl2. In both sets of compounds, electron-withdrawing groups attached to sulfur or nitrogen appear to favor the E conformations. The electronegativities of the groups are taken to increase in the order methyl < vinyl ∼ phenyl ∼ cyclopropyl < hydrogen < ethynyl. Data from the literature are discussed in these terms, including the E−Z energy differences for formic acid and its ethynyl, vinyl, and methyl esters.

References

37