Treatment, patterns of failure, and survival of patients with Stage I nodal and extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, according to data in the population-based registry of the comprehensive cancer centre west

Augustinus D. G. Krol, J. Hermans, Lilian Dawson, Simone Snijder, Pierre W. Wijermans, Hanneke C. Kluin‐Nelemans, Philip M. Kluin, J. Han van Krieken, Evert M. Noordijk

Cancer · 1998 · 15 citations · 16 references

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary extranodal lymphomas (EN-NHLs) are a heterogeneous category of tumors that are considered to be different from primary nodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (N-NHLs). To what extent these differences have clinical implications is currently not very clear, because knowledge of EN-NHL as a separate group is limited. METHODS: Using data from the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West (CCCW) population-based NHL registry in the Netherlands, N-NHL and EN-NHL patients were compared to determine differences in characteristics at diagnosis, responses to treatment, patterns of failure, and survival. RESULTS: At presentation, EN-NHL patients had poorer performance scores and more often bulky tumors compared with N-NHL patients, resulting in poorer responses to treatment (complete response rates were 72% and 84%, respectively; P=0.04) and inferior 5-year overall survival (49% and 63%, respectively; P=0.003). Among EN-NHL patients, considerable variations in response, survival, and relapse rates were observed, with gastric NHL patients having the best and central nervous system NHL patients having the worst prognosis (66% and 7% 5-year overall survival, respectively). Relapse rates for N-NHL and EN-NHL patients did not differ (39% and 36% 5-year relapse rates, respectively), whereas among EN-NHL patients considerable differences in relapse rates were noted. Relapses among N-NHL patients were mainly found in nodal sites, whereas recurrent disease in EN-NHL patients was mainly found in extranodal sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, Stage I EN-NHL patients as a group had a poorer prognosis than N-NHL patients. However, among EN-NHL patients, considerable differences in response, relapse risk, and survival were observed. The failure analysis conducted in this study suggests that patterns of dissemination for N-NHL and EN-NHL are different.

References

16