Screen Selection for Sand Control Based on Laboratory Tests

George Gillespie, Calvin K. Deem, Christophe Malbrel

SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition · 2000 · 83 citations · 11 references

Concepts

Abstract

Abstract Oil and gas production from unconsolidated/weakly- consolidated sands requires a production screen in the hole to inhibit the movement of formation sand and keep the hole open. For open hole completions where the sand control screen directly retains the formation sand, proper screen selection is necessary to provide optimum life and minimum sand passing. Several screen sizing selection criteria are available in the literature such as Saucier, Coberly, Schwartz and others. However, these rules may not always be applicable, especially when premium screens, with metal meshes are used. These screens may use multi layers of wire mesh and its complex shaped pore opening may result in retention performance quite different from wire wrap screen slots. Experimental work has been done on a very fine (d50 = 115- 130 μm) uniform (uniformity coefficient = d40/d90= 3) and a non-uniform (uniformity coefficient = ca 7) sands on a series of commercial screens segments. These screens include standard wire wrap and also premium grade screens. The testing consisted of pressure drop measurements and sand retention while the screen is subjected to a fluidized stream of sand. Analysis of the data provides a method of measuring screen performance during and after filter cake bridging/building. Utilizing this data, screen performance, i.e. comparative lifetime and sand passing can be projected based on a maximum a pressure drop across the screen assembly. This analysis method is applicable for any type of screen and formation. Where possible, the results from the experimental tests are compared to prior literature screen selection methods. Graphs of the normalized data allow for a logical selection of the appropriate screen for a given formation sand. Technical Contribution: A new procedure for the selection of production screens applicable to any formationA comparison of the new method with prior literature methodsA comparison of performance of wire wrapped screens and premium screens.

References

11