The Journal of Risk Finance · 2000 · 60 citations · 2 references
Financial Risk ManagementRisk MetricAsset AllocationPortfolio ManagementCatastrophe Risk InsuranceAsset PricingCorporate Risk ManagementInsurance‐linked SecuritiesRisk ManagementFinancial SecurityRisk ModelsManagementInsuranceOptimal Investment SecurityRisk AnalyticsAccountingFinanceSecurity MarketInsurance MarketsFinancial EconomicsInsurance LawBusinessMutual FundsNatural Catastrophe RiskFinancial Risk
Insurance‑linked securities provide issuers with additional risk capital at low credit risk and offer investors excess returns uncorrelated with other financial assets. This article explains insurance and reinsurance terminology, the structure of insurance‑linked securities, and reviews major transactions. The authors discuss stochastic catastrophe modeling for assessing natural catastrophe risk, compare risk‑adjusted returns of recent securitizations, and note that CAT bonds are high‑alpha assets due to their market‑risk independence. CAT bonds outperform high‑yield bonds with wide spreads, attractive Sharpe ratios, and superior risk‑adjusted returns, and a modest allocation in a fixed‑income portfolio can boost expected return while reducing risk without altering distributional skewness or kurtosis.
Insurance‐linked securities can benefit both issuers and investors; they supply insurance and reinsurance companies with additional risk capital at reasonable prices (with little or no credit risk), and supply excess returns to investors that are uncorrelated with the returns of other financial assets. This article explains the terminology of insurance and reinsurance, the structure of insurance‐linked securities, and provides an overview of major transactions. First, there is a discussion of how stochastic catastrophe modeling has been applied to assess the risk of natural catastrophes, including the reliability and validation of the risk models. Second, the authors compare the risk‐adjusted returns of recent securitizations on the basis of relative value. Compared with high‐yield bonds, catastrophe (“CAT”) bonds have wide spreads and very attractive Sharpe ratios. In fact, the risk‐adjusted returns on CAT bonds dominate high‐yield bonds. Furthermore, since natural catastrophe risk is essentially uncorrelated with market risk, high expected excess returns make CAT bonds high‐alpha assets. The authors illustrate this point and show that a relatively small allocation of insurance‐linked securities within a fixed income portfolio can enhance the expected return and simultaneously decrease risk, without significantly changing the skewness and kurtosis of the return distribution.
2