Archives of Ophthalmology · 1989 · 40 citations · 8 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsClinical EpidemiologyExperimental DesignOutcomes ResearchEffect Size EstimationFailure To TreatHypothesis TestingPower AnalysisSample SizeSubgroup AnalysisAlternative PossibilitiesNumber Needed To TreatPower For Two-sample TestsSample Size CalculationSample Size Estimation
When a published clinical report concludes that there is no difference between two or more groups of patients, the reader must discern between two alternative possibilities. Either there is truly no difference in outcome between the groups or the study failed to detect an actual difference. The application of sample size and power calculations to outcome variables in a clinical study can provide essential insight into resolving this ambiguity. While one can never prove that there is no difference between groups of patients, these techniques can estimate the likelihood that a particular study will detect or fail to detect a difference of specified size.
8
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
F. N. D., J. L. Fleiss · Biometrics · 1973 · 1.4K citations
Angiographic Cystoid Macular Edema After Posterior Chamber Lens Implantation
Philip L. Wright, C. P. Wilkinson, Hal D. Balyeat et al. · Archives of Ophthalmology · 1988 · 135 citations
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +16
John T. Flynn, Eduardo Bancalari, Richard Bawol et al. · Ophthalmology · 1987 · 77 citations