International Journal of Surgery · 2013 · 135 citations · 30 references
NursingOncologyDecision AnalysisDecision MakingCancer CommunicationClinical Decision-makingHealth Care Decision-makingMultidisciplinary Cancer CareMultidisciplinary Team CareShared Decision-makingCollaborative Clinical Decision-makingCoordination Of Multidisciplinary TeamsHealthcare Decision-makingImplementation Decision-makingImplementation Of Shared Decision-makingInterview Study DesignMultidisciplinary Decision-makingProvider Perspective
BACKGROUND: It is becoming a standard practice worldwide for cancer patients to be discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT or 'tumour board') in order to formulate an expert-derived management plan. Evidence suggests that MDTs do not always work optimally in making clinical decisions and that not all MDT decisions get implemented into care. We investigated factors influencing decision-making and decision implementation in cancer MDTs. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with expert MDT members of Urological and Gastro-Intestinal tumours of 3 London (UK) hospitals. The standardised interview protocol assessed MDT experts' views on decision-making, barriers to reaching a decision and implementing it into care, and interventions to improve this process. All interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a standardised approach. Emergent themes were identified by 2 clinical coders and tabulated. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants participated in the study and data collection achieved 'saturation' (i.e., similar themes raised by different participants). Barriers to clinical decision-making included: inadequate clinical information; lack of investigation results; non-attendance of key members; teleconferencing failures. Barriers to implementation of MDT recommendations included: non-consideration of patients' choices or co-morbidities; disease progression at the time of implementation. Proposed interventions included improving the information available for the discussion through a standardised proforma; improving video-conferencing; reducing the MDT caseload (e.g., via selective MDT review of certain patients); and including patients more in the decision process. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing drive to improve the clinical role of the MDT within cancer care. This study demonstrates the main barriers that MDTs face in deciding on and, importantly, implementing a management plan. Further research should prospectively evaluate interventions to enhance translation of MDT decision-making into cancer care and thus to expedite and improve care.
30
Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?
Chris Taylor, Alice Munro, Rob Glynne‐Jones et al. · BMJ · 2010 · 470 citations · Full text
Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams
Jane Blazeby, Leslie Wilson, Chris Metcalfe et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2005 · 229 citations · Full text
Nursing, Oncology, Oncology Nursing +14
Do multidisciplinary team meetings make a difference in the management of lung cancer?
Miriam M. Boxer, Shalini Vinod, Jesmin Shafiq et al. · Cancer · 2011 · 181 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Control +10