Brevity and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication

Kathleen F. McCoy, Jan L. Bedrosian, Linda A. Hoag, Dallas E. Johnson

Augmentative and Alternative Communication · 2006 · 25 citations · 23 references

Concepts

TL;DR

This study is the third in a series examining utterance‑based AAC systems, focusing on trade‑offs when a pre‑stored sentence mismatches the current discourse context. It investigates how speed–brevity trade‑offs affect public attitudes toward users of such systems. Ninety‑six sales clerks watched scripted, videotaped trade‑off message conditions during a bookstore interaction and then completed a questionnaire about attitudes toward customers using utterance‑based systems. Ratings were significantly higher for the quickly delivered, repetitive message condition than for each slowly delivered, non‑repetitive condition, supporting the model of conversational trade‑off choices and its technological applications.

Abstract

This study is the third in a series of studies that have concentrated on utterance-based systems--which allow the relatively quick selection of full sentences--and investigated trade-offs faced by users of such systems when there is a pragmatic mismatch between the prestored sentence and the current discourse context. While the previous studies focused on trade-offs between speed of message delivery and either relevance or informativeness, this study investigated the effects of trade-offs between speed of message delivery and brevity on public attitudes. Participating were 96 sales clerks who viewed scripted, videotaped trade-off message conditions in the context of a bookstore interaction and completed a questionnaire designed to assess their attitudes toward customers who used utterance-based systems and his or her communication. Significantly higher mean ratings were found for the trade-off condition involving the quickly delivered message with repetition when compared to each of the slowly delivered, non-repetitive message conditions (i.e., with and without a preceding conversational floorholder). Implications regarding the model of conversational trade-off choices and its technological applications are discussed.

References

23