Asian Journal of Law and Economics · 2012 · 31 citations · 0 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceDemocratizationJudicial PoliticsJudicial ReviewComparative Judicial PoliticsJudicial AppointmentsJudicial BehaviorJudicial InstitutionsJudicial PowerJudicial SelectionComparative Court BehaviorJudicial Appointment ProcessesJudicial Behavior TheoryJudicial PreferencesJudicial Voting BehaviorRights Of AppointersStrategic Behavior Of Judges
In this paper we investigate empirically the determinants of judicial behavior at the Philippine Supreme Court in the period 1986-2010. Our results show some alignment between individual Justices and the interests of the presidential appointers, although it varies across presidential terms. We discuss these empirical results in the context of the Philippine’s unstable democracy and the implications for the comparative literature on judicial behavior.