Judicial Preferences

Judicial Preferences is a theoretical construct in political science and legal studies that denotes the stable, underlying ideological predispositions or policy-oriented inclinations of individual judges, distinguishing them from legal formalism or strategic behavior by emphasizing their personal valuation of legal outcomes.

405

Publications

24.1K

Citations

463

Authors

240

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

43

Variants

Judicial Ideology

Authors

463

  1. DR
    Donald R. Songer

    University of South Carolina, United States

    16 publications · 911 citations

    14

    h-index

  2. LE
    Lee Epstein

    Washington University in St. Louis, United States

    15 publications · 1.3K citations

    14

    h-index

  3. JA
    Jeffrey A. Segal

    Stony Brook University, United States

    9 publications · 2.2K citations

    9

    h-index

  4. AD
    Andrew D. Martin

    Washington University in St. Louis, United States

    9 publications · 703 citations

    9

    h-index

  5. NG
    Nuno Garoupa

    George Mason University, United States

    8 publications · 205 citations

    8

    h-index

1–5 of 463

Venues

  1. The Journal of Politics

    JP · 29 publications · 2.7K citations

    25

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 39 publications · 1.2K citations

    20

    h-index

  3. American Journal of Political Science

    AJPS · 20 publications · 3.2K citations

    19

    h-index

  4. Political Research Quarterly

    PRQ · 22 publications · 1K citations

    19

    h-index

  5. Law & Society Review

    18 publications · 1.2K citations

    15

    h-index

1–5