Publication | Closed Access
Comparison of Nonionic and Ionic Contrast Agents in the Rabbit Lung
21
Citations
0
References
1991
Year
RadiologyLung DepositionPulmonary CirculationIodine ContentRadiographic Contrast AgentsMedicinePhysiologyPulmonary PhysiologyRabbit LungLung MechanicsClinical ChemistryContrast AgentAnesthesiaPharmacologyIonic Contrast AgentsAnesthesiologyHealth Sciences
The objective of this study was to determine the short- and long-term radiographic, physiologic and histologic changes elicited in the lung of rabbits following the aspiration of commonly used radiographic contrast agents. All agents used, including nonionic agents, caused radiographically evident pulmonary edema which cleared by 24 hours. The contrast materials with higher osmolality, viscosity, and iodine content elicited the greatest physiologic and pathologic changes. No differences were found between an ionic and a nonionic agent with similar viscosities and iodine content, despite a lower osmolality in the nonionic agent. No contrast agent is innocuous when introduced into the lung.