Human Aggression

Jeffrey L. Okey

Journal of Humanistic Psychology · 1992 · 10 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Human aggression research has advanced to the point that a unifying framework is needed, with major domain‑limited theories such as cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer, and personality viewed as stable knowledge structures guiding interpretation and behavior. The review applies the General Aggression Model to organize existing theories of aggression and to identify research gaps and intervention strategies. The authors employ the General Aggression Model, positing that cognition, affect, and arousal mediate situational and personological influences on aggression, and they organize recent theories of aggressive personality development. The review synthesizes current knowledge, identifies theoretical gaps, and proposes future research and intervention strategies to reduce aggression.

Abstract

▪ Abstract Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.

References

19