Applying trait‐based models to achieve functional targets for theory‐driven ecological restoration

Daniel C. Laughlin

Ecology Letters · 2014 · 530 citations · 67 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Manipulating community assemblages to achieve functional targets is a key component of restoring degraded ecosystems, and the response‑and‑effect trait framework offers a conceptual foundation for translating restoration goals into functional trait targets, though a quantitative framework has been lacking. The study introduces generalisable, flexible trait‑based models that generate species‑abundance ranges to test which traits, trait values, and assemblages best achieve functional outcomes, and aims to apply them across terrestrial ecosystems to advance understanding of setting functional trait targets for restoration. The authors developed trait‑based models that generate species‑abundance ranges to evaluate theories on trait, trait‑value, and assemblage effectiveness for functional outcomes. Examples show that the framework can generate indigenous species assemblages to achieve desired community responses via environmental filtering, limiting similarity, and competitive hierarchies, or to enhance ecosystem functions through mass ratios and niche complementarity, thereby offering a robust scaffold for applying ecological theory to maintain resilient ecosystems.

Abstract

Abstract Manipulating community assemblages to achieve functional targets is a key component of restoring degraded ecosystems. The response‐and‐effect trait framework provides a conceptual foundation for translating restoration goals into functional trait targets, but a quantitative framework has been lacking for translating trait targets into assemblages of species that practitioners can actually manipulate. This study describes new trait‐based models that can be used to generate ranges of species abundances to test theories about which traits, which trait values and which species assemblages are most effective for achieving functional outcomes. These models are generalisable, flexible tools that can be widely applied across many terrestrial ecosystems. Examples illustrate how the framework generates assemblages of indigenous species to (1) achieve desired community responses by applying the theories of environmental filtering, limiting similarity and competitive hierarchies, or (2) achieve desired effects on ecosystem functions by applying the theories of mass ratios and niche complementarity. Experimental applications of this framework will advance our understanding of how to set functional trait targets to achieve the desired restoration goals. A trait‐based framework provides restoration ecology with a robust scaffold on which to apply fundamental ecological theory to maintain resilient and functioning ecosystems in a rapidly changing world.

References

67