Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2014 · 50 citations · 18 references
MedicineUrban HealthClinical NutritionMetabolic PhysiologyObesity PreventionAdipose TissueBody CompositionMetabolic HealthMetabolic SyndromeAbdominal AdiposityAnthropometric ComparisonMetabolic Syndrome Risk AssessmentMetabolic Syndrome ScreeningObesity ScreeningRural Population HealthWaist Circumference MeasurementWaist-to-hip Ratio
AIMS: To compare waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and define an appropriate cut-off, which is most closely predictive of the non-adipose components of the IDF metabolic syndrome (MetS) definition. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3,042 adults (1,693 in rural area and 1,349 in urban area) were screened for the presence of MetS according to the IDF definition. Among 3,042 adults selected as subjects, 1,518 were male and 1,524 were female. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was done to determine the optimal cut-off value and the best discriminatory value of each of these anthropometric parameters to predict two or more non-obese components of metabolic syndrome. The area under ROC (AURC) for WC was superior to that for other anthropometric variables. The optimal cut-off value of WC in urban and rural males was >89 cm, which is higher than that in urban and rural females at 83 cm and 79 cm, respectively; the optimal cut-off for WHtR was >0.51 in rural females, 0.52 in rural males, and 0.53 in both urban males and females. Both parameters were found to be better than BMI and WHR. ROC and AURC values for WC were better than those for WHtR in men and women in both urban and rural areas (P = 0.0054); however, when the entire study cohort was analyzed together, irrespective of gender and place of residence, then at a value of 0.52, WHtR scored over WC as a predictor of metabolic syndrome (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the predictive value of different gender-specific WC values is clearly superior to other anthropometric measures for predicting two or more non-adipose components of MetS, a single value of WHtR irrespective of gender and the area of residence can be used as a universal screening tool for the identification of individuals at high risk of development of metabolic complications.
18
K. G. M. M. Alberti, Paul Zimmet · Diabetic Medicine · 1998 · 15.3K citations
Marie‐Christine Pouliot, Jean‐Pierre Després, Simone Lemieux et al. · The American Journal of Cardiology · 1994 · 2.1K citations
Megan Dalton, Adrian J. Cameron, Paul Zimmet et al. · Journal of Internal Medicine · 2003 · 679 citations · Full text
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an Indian urban population
Rajeev Gupta, Prakash Deedwania, Arvind Gupta et al. · International Journal of Cardiology · 2004 · 310 citations
Medicine, Urban Health, Epidemiology +11