Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 1997 · 106 citations · 85 references
MedicinePharmacologyPharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyPain ManagementPain MedicineAnalgesiaAnalgesic PharmacologyOpioid AnalgesicsOpioid PharmacologyOpioid TherapyPharmacologic Pain TherapyAnalgesic EffectsCancer Pain Opioid TherapyCancer Pain PharmacotherapyKappa Opioid Receptor PharmacologyOpioid Receptor AgonistsPain PharmacologyPharmacologic AnalgesiaPharmacological Pain Relief
Despite the recent introduction of a number of new compounds, there has of late been a cooling of interest by pharmaceutical companies in the development of centrally-active, selective kappa opioid agonists for therapeutic purposes. This is reflected in the discontinuation of a number of clinical trials, for reasons that are often not completely clear to outside observers. Spiradoline and enadoline have apparently been abandoned as potential analgesics because they induce dose-limiting central side-effects (i.e., dysphoria) in models of post-surgical pain. The development of niravoline as an aquaretic for the treatment of cirrhosis with ascites and other hyponatraemic disorders has also been halted. Enadoline may yet find some application against ischaemic stroke and severe head injury, presumably in comatose patients in whom psychiatric side-effects are taken to be immaterial, while apadoline and TRK 820 remain in Phase II clinical testing against cancer pain. The peripherally-selective kappa agonists, asimadoline, and the atypical compound, fedotozine, are well-tolerated in man. Results of Phase III trials of fedotozine against irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia have, however, ultimately been disappointing, whereas asimadoline is currently in Phase II clinical trials against pain of rheumatic and osteoarthritic origin. The results of these trials are eagerly awaited.
85
Kappa–opioids produce significantly greater analgesia in women than in men
Robert W. Gear, Christine Miaskowski, Newton C. Gordon et al. · Nature Medicine · 1996 · 456 citations