Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 2008 · 126 citations · 9 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringDesign OptimizationFoundation EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringFooting DesignFoundation ConstructionFoundation SystemsGeotechnical DesignSoil-structure InteractionCohesionless Soil BehaviorConstructionFoundation DesignServiceability Limit State DesignSoil PropertiesSpread Footing DesignUltimate Limit State DesignUltimate Limit States
Geotechnical foundation design must satisfy ultimate limit state, serviceability limit state, and economics, yet conventional methods prioritize ULS/SLS and evaluate economics afterward. The study proposes a design approach that explicitly incorporates construction economics to achieve minimum construction cost. The approach is formulated as an optimization process that minimizes construction cost, treating design parameters as variables and design requirements as constraints. Illustrated with a spread footing example, the method shows that economically optimized designs vary regionally, key soil parameters (E and ϕ′) drive cost sensitivity, and a stringent ULS requirement typically satisfies the SLS requirement.
A geotechnical foundation design should address at least three basic requirements: ultimate limit state (ULS), serviceability limit state (SLS), and economics. Most conventional design approaches focus on ULS and/or SLS optimization, with economics being evaluated afterwards. As an alternative, this paper develops a design approach that explicitly considers the construction economics and results in a foundation that has the minimum construction cost. This design approach is expressed as an optimization process, in which the objective is to minimize construction cost, with the design parameters and design requirements as the optimization variables and constraints, respectively. This design approach is illustrated using a spread footing example. Because construction costs vary by locale, the economically optimized designs differ regionally. Sensitivity studies on soil properties and design requirements show that, for typical spread footing designs in cohesionless soils, Young's modulus (E) and the effective friction angle (ϕ′) are the key parameters. A quantitative assessment illustrates the importance of soil property variability on cost. It is also found that, for typical spread footing designs, a relatively stringent ULS requirement generally ensures fulfillment of the SLS requirement.
9
Characterization of geotechnical variability
Kok‐Kwang Phoon, Fred H. Kulhawy · Canadian Geotechnical Journal · 1999 · 2.3K citations
Choice Reviews Online · 2004 · 680 citations
Characterization of geotechnical variability
Kok‐Kwang Phoon, Fred H. Kulhawy · Canadian Geotechnical Journal · 1999 · 360 citations
Foundation design, principles and practices
P.K. Woodward · Engineering Structures · 1997 · 152 citations