Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2010 · 26 citations · 28 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryDiagnostic ImagingInterventional CardiologyAortic ImagingCardiovascular ImagingImplantable Biomedical DevicesMedical Imaging InstrumentationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTranscatheter Valve TherapyArtifact MappingBioprosthetic Heart ValvesCardiac Implantable DevicesIn-vitro CharacterizationPhase-contrast ImagingReal-time Contrast ImagingReal-time ImagingT1-weighted Imaging
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered an attractive alternative for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) featuring unlimited scan plane orientation and unsurpassed soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous device visualization. We sought to evaluate the CMR characteristics of both currently commercially available transcatheter heart valves (Edwards SAPIEN™, Medtronic CoreValve®) including their dedicated delivery devices and of a custom-built, CMR-compatible delivery device for the Medtronic CoreValve® prosthesis as an initial step towards real-time CMR-guided TAVI. METHODS: The devices were systematically examined in phantom models on a 1.5-Tesla scanner using high-resolution T1-weighted 3D FLASH, real-time TrueFISP and flow-sensitive phase-contrast sequences. Images were analyzed for device visualization quality, device-related susceptibility artifacts, and radiofrequency signal shielding. RESULTS: CMR revealed major susceptibility artifacts for the two commercial delivery devices caused by considerable metal braiding and precluding in vivo application. The stainless steel-based Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis was also regarded not suitable for CMR-guided TAVI due to susceptibility artifacts exceeding the valve's dimensions and hindering an exact placement. In contrast, the nitinol-based Medtronic CoreValve® prosthesis was excellently visualized with delineation even of small details and, thus, regarded suitable for CMR-guided TAVI, particularly since reengineering of its delivery device toward CMR-compatibility resulted in artifact elimination and excellent visualization during catheter movement and valve deployment on real-time TrueFISP imaging. Reliable flow measurements could be performed for both stent-valves after deployment using phase-contrast sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the Medtronic CoreValve® prosthesis is potentially suited for real-time CMR-guided placement in vivo after suggested design modifications of the delivery system.
28
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
John G. Webb, Lukas Altwegg, Robert Boone et al. · Circulation · 2009 · 589 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +12
Rodrigo Bagur, John G. Webb, F. Nietlispach et al. · European Heart Journal · 2009 · 486 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +17