Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2003 · 153 citations · 29 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyAngiogenesisAngiogenesis In CancerBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingTumor CharacterizationContrast EnhancementContrast Enhancement AnalysisImmunohistochemical BiomarkersImmunohistochemical DetectionImmunohistochemical MarkersImmunohistochemical StainingVascular Endothelial Growth FactorVascularity Quantification
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between parameters obtained from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of breast cancer using different analysis approaches, as well as their correlation with angiogenesis biomarkers (vascular endothelial growth factor and vessel density). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI results were obtained from 105 patients with breast cancer (108 lesions). Three analysis methods were applied: 1) whole tumor analysis, 2) regional hot-spot analysis, and 3) intratumor pixel-by-pixel analysis. Early enhancement intensities and fitted pharmacokinetic parameters were studied. Paraffin blocks of 71 surgically resected specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining to measure microvessel counts (with CD31) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression levels. RESULTS: MRI parameters obtained from the three analysis methods showed significant correlations (P < 0.0001), but a substantial dispersion from the linear regression line was noted (r = 0.72-0.97). The entire region of interest (ROI) vs. pixel population analyses had a significantly higher association compared to the entire ROI vs. hot-spot analyses. Cancer specimens with high VEGF expression had significantly higher CD31 microvessel densities than did specimens with low VEGF levels (P < 0.005). No significant association was found between MRI parameters obtained from the three analysis strategies and IHC based measurements of angiogenesis. CONCLUSION: A consistent analysis strategy was important in the DCE-MRI study. In this series, none of these strategies yielded results for MRI based quantitation of tumor vascularity that were associated with IHC based measurements. Therefore, different analyses could not account for the lack of association.
29
Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors
Michael V. Knopp, Hans‐Peter Sinn, J Mattern et al. · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 1999 · 406 citations · Full text
Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution
Hadassa Degani, Vadim Gusis, Daphna Weinstein et al. · Nature Medicine · 1997 · 267 citations
Quantitative analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor in primary breast cancer
Masakazu Toi, Shinichi Kondo, Hideo Suzuki et al. · Cancer · 1996 · 196 citations · Full text