Quality of life assessment in patients with implant‐supported and resin‐bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces

Wataru Sonoyama, Takuo Kuboki, Soichiro Okamoto, Hidenori Suzuki, Hikaru Arakawa, Manabu Kanyama, Hirofumi Yatani, Atsushi Yamashita

Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2002 · 50 citations · 24 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dental implants have become increasingly popular in the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with bounded edentulous spaces. Oral condition-related quality of life (QOL) levels have rarely been assessed in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of subjects with bounded edentulous spaces were studied: an implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (11 patients) and a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis group (33 patients). The two groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, missing units and location of missing units. The patients were requested to answer a self-administered QOL questionnaire with two major subscales - oral condition- and general condition-related QOL scores. The test-retest reliability of each question was pre-examined and found acceptable (mean Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.55 +/- 0.16). Mean QOL score differences between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Mean oral condition-related QOL scores of the implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis groups were 87.8 +/- 9.5 and 87.1 +/- 12.3% (P = 0.85), and mean general condition-related QOL scores were 73.8 +/- 14.8 and 71.6 +/- 15.2% (P = 0.95), respectively. No significant QOL differences between the two groups were observed in the two subscales. CONCLUSION: In patients with bounded edentulous spaces, multidimensional QOL levels of patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis do not exceed those of patients with a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis in a short follow-up period.

References

24