Publication | Closed Access
Therapeutic Effect of a New Immunosuppressant, FK-506, on Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
22
Citations
20
References
1993
Year
ImmunologyVeterinary ResearchCyclosporin ANeurovascular DiseaseInflammationThrombosisImmunological ReactionNew ImmunosuppressantHematologySerum ComplementBrain InjuryNeurologyNeuroimmunologyHealth SciencesAutoimmune DiseaseVascular BiologyComplement SystemTherapeutic EffectSubarachnoid HemorrhagePhysiologyVeterinary ScienceHemostasisMedicine
We hypothesized that the immunological reaction against extravasated blood might play a role in the development of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Under the hypothesis, we had reported significant therapeutic efficacy of cyclosporin A on vasospasm in canine models. We here investigated the efficacy of a new, potent immunosuppressant, FK-506, on vasospasm in animal models. Dogs were randomly classified into sham operated, subarachnoid hemorrhage treated-1 group, (FK-506, 0.3 mg/kg-d, intramuscular injection), and treated-2 group (FK-506, 0.15 mg/kg-d, intramuscular injection). Levels of the third factor of complement (C3) and the activity of serum complement inducing 50% hemolysis of sheep erythrocytes (CH50) in serum were also determined. In the treated groups, the levels of FK-506 in serum were monitored. As for C3 and CH50, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups and there were no changes between Day 1 and Day 7 in any group. Angiographical diameters of a basilar artery on Days 1 and 7 were measured with a computed image analyzer, and the extent of vasospasm was compared among the groups. Statistically significant differences between the sham-operated group and the other three groups were noted. However, under sufficient levels of FK-506 in serum, the extent of vasospasm in either treated group was the same as that in the subarachnoid hemorrhage group. These results indicate a significant discrepancy in the therapeutic mechanism for vasospasm between cyclosporin A and FK-506. They have common aspects in the immunosuppressive mechanism. However, in T-cell suppression, the different mechanism in situ between the two drugs is also postulated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1