Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 1998 · 509 citations · 157 references
Natural SciencesEnvironmental SciencesToxicologyEcotoxicologyEnvironmental ChemistryEnvironmental ToxicologyHeavy Metal BioaccumulationHeavy Metal ContaminationMetal ToxicitySediment ChemistrySediment ToxicitySediment ToxicologyEcological Risk Assessment ModelsEcological Risk Assessment Of SedimentsHeavy Metal BioavailabilityMetal BioavailabilityMetal Bioavailability In SedimentsMetal Ion BioavailabilityMetal Toxicity In SedimentsSediment Ecotoxicology
Metal binding in sediments is dominated by iron and manganese oxyhydroxides and particulate organic carbon, yet the predictive power of models such as the acid‑volatile sulfide (AVS) approach is limited to anaerobic sediments, and while free metal ions are the most bioavailable species, the complex interplay of ligand complexation, oxidation, and biotic site binding models remains poorly quantified, complicating ecological risk assessment that must account for metal transformation, essentiality, and adaptation. Hazard identification and ecological risk assessment rely on determining metal bioavailability from water and food, which can be evaluated prospectively through normalized sediment chemistry and laboratory bioassays or retrospectively via in‑situ bioassays and field studies.
Major metal-binding phases in the aerobic layer of sediments are iron and manganese oxyhydroxides (FeOOH and MnOOH) and particulate organic carbon (POC). The acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) model proposed for predicting nontoxicity from metals-contaminated sediments is only applicable to anaerobic sediments. In other sediments, normalization by POC or FeOOH and MnOOH may be predictive, but binding constants are not well understood. Metal mobilization is enhanced by ligand complexation and oxidation of anaerobic sediments. Free metal ion is the most bioavailable species, but other labile metal species and nonchemical variables also determine metal bioavailability; biotic site binding models have shown promise predicting toxicity for systems of differing chemistry. Hazard identification and ecological risk assessment (ERA) depend on determining bioavailability, from water (overlying, interstitial) and food, which can be done prospectively (e.g., normalized sediment chemistry, laboratory bioassays) or retrospectively (e.g., in situ bioassays, field studies). ERA of sediment-bound metals requires primary emphasis on toxicity and consideration of the three separate transformation processes for metals in the aquatic environment, the differences between essential and nonessential metals, the complex interactions that control bioavailability, adaptation, which may occur relatively simply without appreciable cost to the organism, weight of evidence, and causality.
157
Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 1.7K citations
Dominic M. Di Toro, Christopher S. Zarba, David J. Hansen et al. · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 1991 · 1.4K citations · Full text