Publication | Open Access
Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issues from the North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project.
70
Citations
8
References
1996
Year
Family MedicineEvidence-based InterventionSystematic Literature StudyGuideline Development ProjectEducationResearch EthicsLanguage StudiesDecision MakingMedical GuidelineHealth PolicyCommunity EngagementInterest Inclinical GuidelinesEvidence-based RecommendationResearch SynthesisInformal ConsensusPerformance StudiesValid GuidelinesPatient SafetyMedicineProcedural IssuesEvidence-based PracticeGuidance Services
Thereisincreasing interest inclinical guidelines within theUnitedKingdom. Withthis interest hascomeanincreasing awareness of themethodological issues involved inguideline development, although reports arelimited.' Woolfdescribed threemainmethodsof guideline development: informal consensus, formal consensus, andevidence linked.2 In guidelines developed through informal consensus, themethodusedmostofteninthe UnitedKingdom,theguideline panelhas poorly defined, oftenimplicit, criteria for decision making. Development by formal consensus, usedby many consensusdevelopment conferences andDelphi groups, provides greater structure totheanalytical process butstill fails toprovide anexplicit
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1