Rapid Prototyping Journal · 2006 · 20 citations · 8 references
EngineeringDesignManufacturing EngineeringManufacturing ProcessesMicrofabricationProcess Design3D PrintingDesign For ManufacturingRapid PrototypingResponse Surface MethodologyMold DesignProcess CapabilityProcess Capability ImprovementProcess Capability ModelingStereolithography
Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a study of the stereolithography apparatus SLA 250‐50 motivated by the introduction of the new epoxy resin AccuGen™. Design/methodology/approach – Several process variables are examined using a Box‐Behnken design and optimization techniques are employed to determine their optimal settings. Findings – The results indicate operating conditions at which high levels of performance can be achieved. Research limitations/implications – The results reported in this research are process specific, however, the methodology employed can be readily applied to different rapid prototyping processes. Practical implications – Effective utilization of the SL process. Originality/value – Quantitative understanding of the process capability in relation to key process variables.
8
Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces
Anne E. Freeny, George E. P. Box, Norman R. Draper · Technometrics · 1988 · 5.1K citations
Raymond H. Myers, Douglas C. Montgomery · IIE Transactions · 1996 · 3.8K citations
Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses
Eric R. Ziegel, André I. Khuri, John A. Cornell · Technometrics · 1997 · 1.5K citations