Lung Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Anatomical Atlases With Nonrigid Registration

Sema Candemir, Stefan Jaeger, Kannappan Palaniappan, Jonathan P. Musco, Rahul Kumar Singh, Zhiyun Xue, Alexandros Karargyris, Sameer Antani, George R. Thoma, Clement J. McDonald

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2013 · 662 citations · 56 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Let's parse content. Background: two sentences: about NLM developing digital CXR screening system for TB detection; and about automatic detection of lung regions as critical component. Purpose/Mechanism: same line: "In this paper, we present a nonrigid registration-driven robust lung segmentation method using image retrieval-based patient specific adaptive lung models that detects lung boundaries, surpassing state-of-the-art performance." This covers both purpose and mechanism? But we also have separate Mechanism section later.

Abstract

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) is developing a digital chest X-ray (CXR) screening system for deployment in resource constrained communities and developing countries worldwide with a focus on early detection of tuberculosis. A critical component in the computer-aided diagnosis of digital CXRs is the automatic detection of the lung regions. In this paper, we present a nonrigid registration-driven robust lung segmentation method using image retrieval-based patient specific adaptive lung models that detects lung boundaries, surpassing state-of-the-art performance. The method consists of three main stages: 1) a content-based image retrieval approach for identifying training images (with masks) most similar to the patient CXR using a partial Radon transform and Bhattacharyya shape similarity measure, 2) creating the initial patient-specific anatomical model of lung shape using SIFT-flow for deformable registration of training masks to the patient CXR, and 3) extracting refined lung boundaries using a graph cuts optimization approach with a customized energy function. Our average accuracy of 95.4% on the public JSRT database is the highest among published results. A similar degree of accuracy of 94.1% and 91.7% on two new CXR datasets from Montgomery County, MD, USA, and India, respectively, demonstrates the robustness of our lung segmentation approach.

References

56