Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages · 2012 · 135 citations · 0 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsLanguage AcquisitionLinguistic AnthropologySociolinguisticsIndigenous LanguagesLanguage ChangeLanguage ContactLanguage VariationMultilingualismSecond Language AcquisitionCode-switchingCode-switching In DiscourseCode-switching In Learner LanguageDiachronic GrammarLanguage Contact VarietiesMixed LanguagesSpeaker Consistency
Gurindji Kriol is a contact variety in northern Australia identified as a mixed language, yet its autonomy is questioned because it is spoken alongside its source languages, closely resembles code‑switching between Gurindji and Kriol, and shares structural patterns with that code‑switching. The paper presents criteria that support Gurindji Kriol’s status as an autonomous language. The authors provide structural indicators that can distinguish Gurindji Kriol mixed‑language clauses from code‑switched clauses. Gurindji Kriol is a stable language with child learners, inter‑speaker consistency, independent forms and structural subsystems not adopted back into the source languages, and it contains rare structural features from both languages compared to other contact varieties.
Gurindji Kriol is a contact variety spoken in northern Australia which has been identified as a mixed language. Yet its status as an autonomous language system must be questioned for three reasons — (i) it continues to be spoken alongside its source languages, Gurindji and Kriol, (ii) it has a close diachronic and synchronic relationship to code-switching between Gurindji and Kriol, and (iii) its structure bears a strong resemblance to patterns found in this code-switching. Nonetheless in this paper I present criteria which support the claim of ‘language-hood’ for Gurindji Kriol. I demonstrate that Gurindji Kriol (i) is a stable language variety (it has child language learners and a high degree of inter-speaker consistency), (ii) has developed independent forms and structural subsystems which have not been adopted back into the source languages, and (iii) contains structural features from both languages which is rare in other language contact varieties including Kriol/Gurindji code-switching. I also present a number of structural indicators which can be used to distinguish Gurindji Kriol mixed language clauses from code-switched clauses.