Journal of Aircraft · 2014 · 49 citations · 18 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringAerodynamicsAircraft DesignComputational Fluid DynamicsAerodynamic DesignComputational AerodynamicsFlight PerformanceHigh-lift System DesignPropulsion IntegrationWing AerodynamicsAircraft Aerodynamic DesignClimb Performance AnalysisHigh-lift Configuration DesignInstallation EffectsLift AugmentationLift-to-drag RatioLift-to-drag Ratio EffectsPropeller Installation Effects
Preliminary design studies show that high‑speed propellers combined with internally blown flaps can improve takeoff performance of cruise‑efficient short‑takeoff and landing aircraft at competitive operating costs. The study evaluates the aerodynamic integration effects on climb performance of three propeller‑wing configurations—tractor, over‑wing, and channel wing—on a simplified wing segment at takeoff conditions. The authors compare the original tractor configuration to an over‑wing propeller and a partially embedded channel‑wing rotor, using steady Reynolds‑averaged Navier–Stokes simulations with an actuator disk model to assess aerodynamic integration. The conventional tractor propeller generates large lift and drag increases, whereas the over‑wing configuration reduces these effects, improving lift‑to‑drag ratio and propulsive efficiency; the channel‑wing design offers moderate lift gain and less nosedown pitching moment, but over‑wing propellers suffer from inhomogeneous inflow that causes oscillating blade loads and lower efficiency.
Preliminary design studies indicate that a cruise-efficient short takeoff and landing aircraft has enhanced takeoff performance at competitive direct operating costs when using high-speed propellers in combination with internally blown flaps. The original tractor configuration is compared to an over-the-wing propeller, which allows for noise shielding. An additional geometry with partially embedded rotor similar to a channel wing is considered to increase the beneficial interaction. This paper shows the aerodynamic integration effects with a focus on climb performance and provides an assessment of the three aforementioned configurations for a simplified wing segment at takeoff conditions. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations have been conducted using an actuator disk model and were evaluated based on the overall design. Interacting with the blown flap, the conventional tractor propeller induces large lift and drag increments due to the vectored sliptream. Although this effect is much smaller for an over-the-wing configuration, by halving the lift augmentation, the lift-to-drag ratio and the propulsive efficiency are considerably improved. Besides a moderate lift gain, the main advantage of a channel wing design is the location of the thrust vector close to the center of gravity resulting in a smaller nosedown pitching moment due to thrust. A disadvantage of over-the-wing propellers is the inhomogeneous inflow at higher velocity, which leads to oscillating blade loads and reduced efficiency.
18
Propeller-wing integration for minimum induced loss
Ilan Kroo · Journal of Aircraft · 1986 · 104 citations