Concepedia

TLDR

Research on spoken word production has mainly examined lexical selection and phonological planning, with limited focus on how phonological planning interacts with articulatory processes. This study uses the tongue‑twister paradigm to investigate the interaction between phonological planning and articulatory processes. Acoustic analysis of tongue‑twister errors shows that partially activated phonological representations leave traces in articulatory parameters, such as longer VOT for k→g errors, with cascading activation from word‑level processes reducing these traces and non‑local voicing cues remaining unaffected.

Abstract

Research into spoken word production has often focused on the interaction of lexical selection processes and phonological planning. Less attention has been given to the relationship between phonological planning and articulatory processes. The current study considers evidence from the tongue-twister paradigm to investigate such potential interactions. Acoustic analyses of various parameters of obstruents voicing in tongue twister productions show that errors induced in tongue twisters leave acoustic “traces” of the intended target. For example, the voice-onset time of “k”→[g] error tokens had a mean VOT that was longer than correctly produced “g”→[g] tokens, reflecting a trace of the voiceless [k] target. This effect is attributed to the cascade of partially activated phonological representations of the target consonant into articulatory processes. Consistent with this account, a post-hoc analysis revealed an additional influence of cascading activation from word-level processes; traces of the target were reduced in word outcomes relative to nonword outcomes. Finally, extension of these analyses to a set of secondary cues to obstruent voicing showed that non-local cues are not influenced by tongue twister production errors.

References

YearCitations

Page 1