Publication | Closed Access
Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
215
Citations
0
References
2007
Year
Citizen JournalismFake NewsPublic OpinionPolitical PolarizationPolitical BehaviorCommunicationMisinformationJournalismMedia StudiesSocial SciencesSocial MediaMedia ActivismLegitimate MediaMedia EffectsPolitical CommunicationContent AnalysisDisinformation DetectionConspiracy TheoryMedia PsychologyMedia InstitutionsMedia BiasArtsMedia UseGlobal MediaPolitical AttitudesCritical Media StudiesMass CommunicationSeptember 11Information WarfarePolitical Science
A survey of 1,010 randomly selected adults asked about media use and belief in three conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11, 2001. “Paranoid style” and “cultural sociology” theories are outlined, and empirical support is found for both. Patterns vary somewhat by conspiracy theory, but members of less powerful groups (racial minorities, lower social class, women, younger ages) are more likely to believe at least one of the conspiracies, as are those with low levels of media involvement and consumers of less legitimate media (blogs and grocery store tabloids). Consumers of legitimate media (daily newspapers and network TV news) are less likely to believe at least one of the conspiracies, although these relationships are not significant after controlling for social structural variables. Beliefs in all three conspiracies are aligned with mainstream political party divisions, evidence that conspiracy thinking is now a normal part of mainstream political conflict in the United States.