The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism

TLDR

The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism has attracted wide interest, yet critics argue that authoritarian institutions are epiphenomenal to deeper political, social, and economic relations and that such perspectives have been largely ignored in recent literature. The article reviews three prominent books on authoritarian institutions, focusing on their theoretical propositions about the origins, functions, and effects of dominant party institutions on authoritarian rule. The authors analyze the central theoretical propositions in each book concerning the origins, functions, and effects of dominant party institutions. The article concludes that authoritarian institutions must be studied in conjunction with the concrete problems of redistribution and policymaking that motivate regime behavior.

Abstract

The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism has generated wide interest. This article reviews three prominent books on authoritarian institutions and their central theoretical propositions about the origins, functions and effects of dominant party institutions on authoritarian rule. Two critical perspectives on political institutions, one based on rationalist theories of institutional design and the other based on a social conflict theory of political economy, suggest that authoritarian institutions are epiphenomenal on more fundamental political, social and/or economic relations. Such approaches have been largely ignored in this recent literature, but each calls into question the theoretical and empirical claims that form the basis of institutionalist approaches to authoritarian rule. A central implication of this article is that authoritarian institutions cannot be studied separately from the concrete problems of redistribution and policy making that motivate regime behavior.