Geophysical Research Letters · 2008 · 226 citations · 18 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesOceanographyHydrologic ModelingPhysical OceanographyWater Resources EngineeringBathymetric Elevation ModelingBathymetryData AssimilationOcean Data AssimilationSeafloor MappingSurface Water ModelingBathymetric Uncertainty EstimationChannel RoughnessData Assimilation For Surface WatersRiver BathymetryRiver Discharge EstimationStorage Change EstimationSwath BathymetryWater Surface Elevation Estimation
The proposed Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission would provide measurements of water surface elevation for characterizing storage change and discharge, yet river channel bathymetry remains a significant source of uncertainty in estimating discharge from WSE measurements. In this paper, we demonstrate an ensemble‑based data assimilation (DA) methodology for estimating bathymetric depth and slope from WSE measurements and the LISFLOOD‑FP hydrodynamic model. We performed two proof‑of‑concept experiments using synthetically generated SWOT measurements. The experiments showed that bathymetric depth and slope can be estimated to within 3.0 microradians or 50 cm, respectively, and that estimation accuracy is relatively insensitive to SWOT measurement error because LISFLOOD‑FP input uncertainties dominate.
The proposed Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission would provide measurements of water surface elevation (WSE) for characterization of storage change and discharge. River channel bathymetry is a significant source of uncertainty in estimating discharge from WSE measurements, however. In this paper, we demonstrate an ensemble‐based data assimilation (DA) methodology for estimating bathymetric depth and slope from WSE measurements and the LISFLOOD‐FP hydrodynamic model. We performed two proof‐of‐concept experiments using synthetically generated SWOT measurements. The experiments demonstrated that bathymetric depth and slope can be estimated to within 3.0 microradians or 50 cm, respectively, using SWOT WSE measurements, within the context of our DA and modeling framework. We found that channel bathymetry estimation accuracy is relatively insensitive to SWOT measurement error, because uncertainty in LISFLOOD‐FP inputs (such as channel roughness and upstream boundary conditions) is likely to be of greater magnitude than measurement error.
18
Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter
Gerrit Burgers, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Geir Evensen · Monthly Weather Review · 1998 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 1.5K citations
Measuring surface water from space
Douglas Alsdorf, Ernesto Rodríguez, Dennis P. Lettenmaier · Reviews of Geophysics · 2007 · 1K citations