International Journal of Production Research · 2008 · 37 citations · 45 references
EngineeringIndustrial EngineeringManufacturing EngineeringProcess ControlProduction ControlProduction SystemsFactory AutomationProcess EngineeringProduction SchedulingPull SystemsWork-in-process ControlAutomated Control SystemsHybrid Process SystemsProduction Control SystemsProduction System ArchitectureProduction System DesignProduction System ModelingToyota Production System
Abstract This paper proposes a production control system, DRC-HPP, which uses the when/where rules in dual resource constrained (DRC) systems for a hybrid push-pull (HPP) control, to overcome some difficulties in modelling/implementing DRC/Kanban systems. These rules and the novel 'process-or-transport' and 'whereto' rules are embedded in some policies workers use to decide when to process (transport) parts, and where (whereto). Unlike most control systems, in which a group of workers is always responsible for transporting and another group is always responsible for processing parts, workers in DRC-HPP are responsible for both transporting and processing parts, as in the Toyota Sewn Products Management System (TSS). Yet, unlike TSS, DRC-HPP can be applied in any layout type. Workers transport parts when they are idle in part processing to enhance their utilisations and synchronise transportation. Since the transportation does not require special worker skills, the cost of training workers is not incurred. DRC-HPP is compared with different benchmarks through simulation experiments to evaluate its performance. It performs well under relatively short transportation times with respect to processing times. If they are relatively longer, the issue becomes to determine the number of workers to achieve a performance level. DRC-HPP also facilitates bottleneck management. Keywords: dual resource constrainedhybrid push-pullproduction controlbottleneck management Notes †This article includes a word that is or is asserted to be a proprietary term or trade mark. Its inclusion does not imply it has acquired for legal purposes a non-proprietary or general significance, nor is any other judgement implied concerning its legal status.
45
J. Scott Armstrong, David M. Georgoff · International Journal of Forecasting · 1988 · 18.2K citations
Lot Sizes, Lead Times and In-Process Inventories
Uday S. Karmarkar · Management Science · 1987 · 459 citations
Management, Industrial Engineering, Operations Management +17