New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 · 93 citations · 20 references
MedicineHealth PolicyMaternal HealthMaternal Health PolicyMaternal-fetal MedicineReproductive HealthHealth ExpenditurePregnancyPrenatal CareCost Savings AnalysisLow Birth Weight CareLow Birth Weight ManagementMaternal Health EconomicsPregnancy Care PolicyPrenatal Care CoveragePublic Health BenefitsPublic Health Spending
Public spending for prenatal care in the United States has been justified in recent years primarily by the cost-savings argument. Prenatal care, it is argued, can prevent the costs and medical complications associated with low birth weight; it is public health spending that pays for itself. This proposition seems intuitively reasonable and supports a popular public policy. Moreover, the findings of the body of research we consider here have given this assertion considerable weight and remarkable precision. Few other claims in medicine or in public health can be encapsulated into the statement that for every $1.00 spent, $1.701 (or $2.57 . . .
20
IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE?
M H Hall, P. K. Chng, Ian MacGillivray · The Lancet · 1980 · 255 citations
Nursing, Maternal Health, Obstetrics +10