Circulation · 2004 · 667 citations · 32 references
MedicineCardiologyPhysiologyClinical EpidemiologyPathophysiologyPreventive CardiologyCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular EpidemiologyMetabolic SyndromeC-reactive Protein TestingCardiovascular PhenotypingFramingham Risk ScoreMetabolic CardiomyopathyMetabolic Syndrome EpidemiologyMetabolic Syndrome Risk AssessmentMetabolic Syndrome Screening
Inflammation measured by C‑reactive protein and the metabolic syndrome are linked to cardiovascular disease, yet large population‑based evidence is scarce. The study cross‑sectionally examined 3,037 adults, assessing the relationship between CRP and the metabolic syndrome and evaluating their ability to predict new cardiovascular events over seven years. Metabolic syndrome was present in 24 % of participants, CRP levels increased with the number of syndrome traits, and both MetS and elevated CRP independently predicted incident cardiovascular events (hazard ratios 2.1 and 2.2, respectively), though combining them did not improve risk discrimination beyond either marker alone.
Background— Inflammation (assessed by C-reactive protein [CRP]) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but population-based data are limited. Methods and Results— We assessed the cross-sectional relations of CRP to the MetS (National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, Adult Treatment Panel III definition) in 3037 subjects (1681 women; mean age, 54 years) and the utility of CRP and the MetS to predict new CVD events (n=189) over 7 years. MetS (≥3 of 5 traits) was present in 24% of subjects; mean age-adjusted CRP levels for those with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 MetS traits were 2.2, 3.5, 4.2, 6.0, or 6.6 mg/L, respectively ( P trend <0.0001). In persons with MetS, age-adjusted CRP levels were higher in women than men (7.8 versus 4.6 mg/L; P <0.0001). MetS and baseline CRP were individually related to CVD events (for MetS: age-sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.8; for highest versus lowest CRP quartile: HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.5). Greater risk of CVD persisted for MetS and CRP even after adjustment in a model including age, sex, MetS (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5), and CRP (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.9). The c-statistic associated with the age- and sex-adjusted model including CRP was 0.72; including MetS, 0.74; and including CRP and MetS, 0.74. Conclusions— Elevated CRP levels are related to insulin resistance and the presence of the MetS, especially in women. Although discrimination of subjects at risk of CVD events using both MetS and CRP is not better than using either phenotype alone, both CRP and MetS are independent predictors of new CVD events.
32
Scott M. Grundy · JAMA · 1993 · 27.9K citations
Evaluation Expert Panel on Detection · JAMA · 2001 · 26K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Otolaryngology +10
John Yudkin, Coen D.A. Stehouwer, J.J. Emeis et al. · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 1999 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Chronic Subclinical Inflammation as Part of the Insulin Resistance Syndrome
Andreas Festa, Ralph B. D’Agostino, George Howard et al. · Circulation · 2000 · 2.4K citations
Medicine, Endocrinology, Physiology +17