Publication | Closed Access
Authorisation and Conflict Resolution for Hierarchical Domains
55
Citations
18
References
2007
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringInformation SecurityVerificationLawHierarchical DomainsSemantic WebSubject-based PoliciesFormal VerificationPolicy ManagementDomain CharacteristicData ScienceAccess ControlPolicy FrameworkMechanism DesignPublic PolicyData PrivacyComputer ScienceInformation ManagementData SecurityPonder Policy LanguageDomain TheoryAuthorisation Policy ModelAutomated ReasoningFormal MethodsDomain ModelRegulationComputer Security ModelModel-driven Security
In this paper we generalise the authorisation policy model supported by the Ponder policy language for hierarchically organised domains of managed objects to support subject-based policies and return policies. We describe the authorisation conflicts that can occur and present a strategy to automatically resolve them. In our model each action has four endpoints: the subject call, the subject return, the target call and the target return. Each endpoint can have associated policies which are used to define constraints on which subjects are permitted to call which targets, and what is permitted to be transferred between subjects and targets. Subject-based policies aim to protect the subject from untrusted targets, while target-based policies aim to protect the target from unauthorised subjects. Subject-based policies are defined for and enforced by the subject's PEP, while target-based policies are defined for and enforced by the target's PEP. Although subject-based and target-based policies are separated, they are uniformly specified in our framework.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1