Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · 2015 · 30 citations · 10 references
Natural SciencesPhysicsMetrologyOpticsParticle PhysicsAccelerator PhysicsOptical InstrumentationBeam InstrumentationBeam Position MonitoringBeam Spot SizeInteraction Point MappingPrecisionPrecision Measurement TechniquesSystematic Errors
Optics measurement algorithms have been improved in preparation for the commissioning of the LHC at higher energy, i.e., with an increased damage potential. Due to machine protection considerations the higher energy sets tighter limits in the maximum excitation amplitude and the total beam charge, reducing the signal to noise ratio of optics measurements. Furthermore the precision in 2012 (4 TeV) was insufficient to understand beam size measurements and determine interaction point (IP) $\ensuremath{\beta}$-functions (${\ensuremath{\beta}}^{*}$). A new, more sophisticated algorithm has been developed which takes into account both the statistical and systematic errors involved in this measurement. This makes it possible to combine more beam position monitor measurements for deriving the optical parameters and demonstrates to significantly improve the accuracy and precision. Measurements from the 2012 run have been reanalyzed which, due to the improved algorithms, result in a significantly higher precision of the derived optical parameters and decreased the average error bars by a factor of three to four. This allowed the calculation of ${\ensuremath{\beta}}^{*}$ values and demonstrated to be fundamental in the understanding of emittance evolution during the energy ramp.
10
Model-Independent Beam Dynamics Analysis
J. Irwin, C. X. Wang, Yunxiang Yan et al. · Physical Review Letters · 1999 · 83 citations
Rogelio Tomás, Thomas Bach, R. Calaga et al. · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · 2012 · 55 citations · Full text
M. Aiba, S. Fartoukh, A. Franchi et al. · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · 2009 · 41 citations · Full text