Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction.

Michael A. Hogg, Sarah C. Hains

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1996 · 360 citations · 54 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study discusses how legitimacy, permeability, and the co‑occurrence of social and personal attraction influence cohesion in groups. The paper proposes an intergroup extension of Hogg’s social attraction hypothesis. The authors examined netball teams, measuring objective status, intergroup beliefs, group identification, interpersonal relations, and both depersonalized and personal attraction. Results show that self‑categorization drives group‑membership social attraction, with intergroup status and stability beliefs influencing it indirectly, while interpersonal relations have no effect; moreover, social attraction is largely independent of personal attraction.

Abstract

An intergroup extension of M. A. Hogg's (1992, 1993) social attraction hypothesis is proposed. Netball teams were investigated with measures assessing the relationship between (a) objective status; (b) social beliefs about intergroup status, stability, legitimacy, and permeability; (c) group identification, self-categorization, and prototypicality; (d) interpersonal relations and similarity; (e) depersonalized social attraction; and (f) true personal attraction. As predicted, group-membership-based social attraction was directly influenced by self-categorization; indirectly influenced, through self-categorization, by intergroup status and stability beliefs; and uninfluenced by interpersonal relations. Social attraction (related to prototypicality and group identification ) was relatively independent of personal attraction (related to similarity and interpersonal variables). Legitimacy, permeability, and the empirical co-occurence of social and personal attraction in cohesive groups are discussed.

References

54