Self‐disclosure and identity management by bereaved parents

Sally O. Hastings

Communication Studies · 2000 · 57 citations · 18 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Bereaved‑parent and civilian interactions are framed as intercultural exchanges, where self‑disclosure is crucial for healing a fractured identity. The study investigates how constraints on self‑disclosure between bereaved parents and civilians, driven by five motivations, create interactional difficulties. The authors analyze self‑disclosure through face‑concern theory and examine five motivations—relationship development, reciprocity, social control, self‑clarification, and expression—to understand its constraints.

Abstract

This paper studies constraints on self‐disclosure in interactions between bereaved parents and "civilians,"; or those who are not bereaved parents. The problem of self‐disclosure is examined through the lens of relevant face concerns. Bereaved‐civilian interactions are treated as a form of intercultural communication due to differing cultural identities and rules for communication. In analyzing communicative constraints, five motivations for self‐disclosure are explored for the potential interactional difficulties they create between bereaved parents and civilians. Motivations examined are Relationship Development and Enhancement, Reciprocity, Social Control (also called "Impression Formation"), Self Clarification, and Expression (also called "Catharsis"). Self‐disclosure is a salient form of communication for the bereaved parent because it is through this process that a fractured identity is healed.

References

18