Biometrics · 1999 · 285 citations · 10 references
Confidence intervals are commonly used to estimate treatment differences, but in small early‑phase trials large‑sample approximations may be unreliable. The study proposes test‑based methods for constructing exact confidence intervals for the difference between two binomial proportions. The authors develop test‑based exact intervals derived from the unconditional distribution of two binomial responses and compare their performance to intervals based solely on the observed difference. The exact intervals, derived from the unconditional distribution, guarantee nominal coverage and achieve substantial improvement when using a standardized Z test with a constrained maximum likelihood variance estimate. Summary.
Summary. Confidence intervals are often provided to estimate a treatment difference. When the sample size is small, as is typical in early phases of clinical trials, confidence intervals based on large sample approximations may not be reliable. In this report, we propose test‐based methods of constructing exact confidence intervals for the difference in two binomial proportions. These exact confidence intervals are obtained from the unconditional distribution of two binomial responses, and they guarantee the level of coverage. We compare the performance of these confidence intervals to ones based on the observed difference alone. We show that a large improvement can be achieved by using the standardized Z test with a constrained maximum likelihood estimate of the variance.
10
Comparative analysis of two rates
Olli S. Miettinen, Markku Nurminen · Statistics in Medicine · 1985 · 1.1K citations