Processes and structures of networks: reflections on methodology

Abstract

Abstract The paper discusses the ambiguity of the network concept. The ambiguity may be explained partly by the interface between an economic competitive perspective and a social trust perspective, with the paradoxes this implies. The ambiguity will also partly be linked to the choice of methodology and variables for measurement, determining the perspective of the network. The development and choice of methodology within the analysis of networks have tended to stress the identification of structures and stable conditions, rather than dynamic perspectives. The effort of making a statistical analysis of quantitative information leads to more standardization and attempts to register quantifiable information. Some perspectives and uses of networks are, however, difficult to measure quantitatively. Applying metaphors, cases and models would more adequately capture the dynamics and the fluid processes of networks. The purpose of this methodological discussion is to capture some of the more substantial traits of certain networks of change, as some of the dynamic processes and strategic access via 'weak ties' will hardly show in the structural characteristics, as the frequency of contact is too limited and occasional. Keywords: methodsnetworknetwork processesparadoxstrong tiesstructural holestrustweak ties