American Political Science Review · 1985 · 565 citations · 27 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceSocial PsychologyPolitical BehaviorPublic OpinionSocial PerceptionAttribution ProcessesBiasPolitical AttitudesPolitical IdeologyPublic Opinion MeasurementSocial JudgmentAttitude AscriptionAttitude CertaintyIssue AttitudesLikability JudgmentsPolitical HeuristicsPolitical Information ProcessingPolitical OrientationsSocial Attributions
This article shows that citizens can estimate what politically strategic groups—liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, and blacks and whites—stand for on major issues. These attitude attributions follow from a simple calculus, a likability heuristic. This heuristic is rooted in people's likes and dislikes of political groups. Thanks to this affective calculus, many in the mass public are able to estimate who stands for what politically, notwithstanding shortfalls in information and information processing.
27
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Edward C. Banfield, Anthony J. Downs · Midwest Journal of Political Science · 1958 · 18.9K citations
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Theodore M. Newcomb, Fritz Heider · American Sociological Review · 1958 · 12K citations
Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications.
Craig Robertson, C. Mallikarjuna Rao · Biometrics · 1975 · 3.6K citations